Benton: until (not including) 4.4.4

3 files changed, 33 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 79dc9ca..91822cf 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ TARGET=$(FULL) $(SHORT) $(TINY)
 all: $(TARGET)
 
 %-tiny.pdf: %.tex handouts.sty
-	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-tiny '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\let\ifshowpagenrs\iffalse\input{$<}'
-	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-tiny '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\let\ifshowpagenrs\iffalse\input{$<}'
+	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-tiny '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\let\ifshowideas\iffalse\let\ifshowpagenrs\iffalse\input{$<}'
+	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-tiny '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\let\ifshowideas\iffalse\let\ifshowpagenrs\iffalse\input{$<}'
 
 %-short.pdf: %.tex handouts.sty
-	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-short '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\input{$<}'
-	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-short '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\input{$<}'
+	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-short '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\let\ifshowideas\iffalse\input{$<}'
+	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) -jobname=$(basename $<)-short '\let\ifshownotes\iffalse\let\ifshowcriticism\iffalse\let\ifshowideas\iffalse\input{$<}'
 
 %.pdf: %.tex handouts.sty
 	$(TEX) $(TEXFLAGS) $<
diff --git a/benton-handout.tex b/benton-handout.tex
index 2d83d4a..75151ad 100644
--- a/benton-handout.tex
+++ b/benton-handout.tex
@@ -357,7 +357,26 @@
 	These verbs have usually one argument, and thus passivization is difficult,
 		since it usually reduces the number of arguments.
 	Nevertheless, Niphael and Hitpael forms are not uncommon for these verbs.
-	In these cases, an implicit Agent appears, in others, situation aspect is transformed.
+	In these cases, an implicit Agent appears, in others, situation aspect is transformed\pagenr{303}.
+	\parnote{%
+		Examples of situation aspect distinction:
+		Ex.~34:2,5: \emph{stand} and \emph{going to stand};
+		Gn.~8:12 \emph{wait until a moment} and Ps.~37:7 \emph{the activity of waiting}.}
+	
+	\parnote{%
+		The verb \emph{go, walk} appears almost exclusively in the Hitpael when passive.
+		It is then a \emph{wandering around}\pagenr{313}.
+		\idea{does this have to do with the nomadic origins of the Hebrew people?}
+		This supports the situation aspectual distinction,
+			since walking cannot really be conceived statively.
+		\emph{Flee}, however, appears mostly in the Niphal, hence it focuses on the resulting state\pagenr{314}.
+	}
+
+	Niphal yiqtol forms (e.g. Qoh.~7:26) present a problem:
+		how to combine the resultative and imperfective aspect\pagenr{318}?
+	The yiqtol expresses an iterative sense, here:
+		this is a general rule that applies to every individual.
+	Every individual ends in the same state, hence the Niphal.
 }
 
 \end{document}
diff --git a/handouts.sty b/handouts.sty
index bd25d45..d514362 100644
--- a/handouts.sty
+++ b/handouts.sty
@@ -15,12 +15,19 @@
 	\newif\ifshowcriticism
 	\showcriticismtrue
 }{}
+\@ifundefined{ifshowideas}{%
+	\newif\ifshowideas
+	\showideastrue
+}{}
 
 \newcommand{\pagenrStyle}{\small\color{darkgray}}
 
 \newcommand{\criticismStart}{\emph{Criticism:} }
 \newcommand{\criticismStyle}{\color{RedOrange}}
 
+\newcommand{\ideaStart}{\emph{Idea:} }
+\newcommand{\ideaStyle}{\color{RedOrange}}
+
 \newcommand{\noteStyle}{\color{gray}}
 
 \newcommand{\termStyle}{\it}
@@ -40,5 +47,7 @@
 	\parnote{\enspace(#1)}}
 \newcommand{\criticism}[1]{%
 	\ifshowcriticism\begingroup\criticismStyle\criticismStart{}#1\endgroup\fi}
+\newcommand{\idea}[1]{%
+	\ifshowideas\begingroup\ideaStyle\ideaStart{}#1\endgroup\fi}
 \newcommand{\term}[1]{%
 	\begingroup\termStyle #1\endgroup}