Finish Evans-Green

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/evans-green-handout.tex b/evans-green-handout.tex
index 5640bc6..bf056dc 100644
--- a/evans-green-handout.tex
+++ b/evans-green-handout.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\documentclass[9pt,twocolumn,a4paper]{extarticle}
+\documentclass[twocolumn,a4paper]{article}
 
 \usepackage[top=2cm]{geometry}
 \usepackage[british]{babel}
@@ -18,6 +18,19 @@
 \maketitle
 
 \summary{
+	\subsection*{Perspective: trajector-landmark organisation and deixis}
+	The perspective from which a scene is viewed has consequences for the relative prominence of its participants\pagenr{541}.
+	The grammatical functions subject and object are reflections of perspective.
+	The subject is a trajector (TR); the object, a landmark (LM).
+	Under passivization, a clause's TR and LM flip,
+		but the semantical subject (energy source, see below) and object (energy sink) do not.
+
+	Perspective also includes subjectivity:
+		when a sentence is objectively construed, the ground is made explicit%
+			\note{I like cats};
+		when a sentence is subjectively construed, it is not%
+			\note{Cats are nice}\pagenr{544}.
+
 	\subsection*{Grammatical functions and transitivity}
 	The prototypical action of a transitive verb is an energy transfer from the Agent to the Patient\pagenr{601}.
 	The prototypical action chain can be depicted as in \autoref{fig:action-chain}.
@@ -41,7 +54,21 @@
 
 	Different semantic roles can be categorised according to a thematic hierarchy (Fillmore 1968).
 	How many roles there are, what labels they should be given,
-		and if they should be categorised or seen as on a prototypical scale, remain points of debate.
+		and if they should be categorised or seen as on a prototypical scale, remain points of debate\pagenr{604}.
+
+	Experiencer-Stimulus relations don't display energy transfer,
+		but often still have a notation of directionality%
+		\note{e.g. `She loves him'}.
+	When there is no directionality%
+		\note{e.g. `He resembles George Clooney'},
+		the speaker chooses to focus attention on one particular participant\pagenr{605}.
+
+	Since the subject is upstream in terms of energy flow,
+		a clause may have a subject and no object, but not vice versa%
+		\note{the object is meaningless without a subject}.
+	Such intransitive clauses still profile relations,
+		since they describe an interaction of the subject with itself
+		or a change in the world.
 }
 
 \end{document}