summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/evans-green-handout.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'evans-green-handout.tex')
-rw-r--r--evans-green-handout.tex31
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/evans-green-handout.tex b/evans-green-handout.tex
index 5640bc6..bf056dc 100644
--- a/evans-green-handout.tex
+++ b/evans-green-handout.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\documentclass[9pt,twocolumn,a4paper]{extarticle}
+\documentclass[twocolumn,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[top=2cm]{geometry}
\usepackage[british]{babel}
@@ -18,6 +18,19 @@
\maketitle
\summary{
+ \subsection*{Perspective: trajector-landmark organisation and deixis}
+ The perspective from which a scene is viewed has consequences for the relative prominence of its participants\pagenr{541}.
+ The grammatical functions subject and object are reflections of perspective.
+ The subject is a trajector (TR); the object, a landmark (LM).
+ Under passivization, a clause's TR and LM flip,
+ but the semantical subject (energy source, see below) and object (energy sink) do not.
+
+ Perspective also includes subjectivity:
+ when a sentence is objectively construed, the ground is made explicit%
+ \note{I like cats};
+ when a sentence is subjectively construed, it is not%
+ \note{Cats are nice}\pagenr{544}.
+
\subsection*{Grammatical functions and transitivity}
The prototypical action of a transitive verb is an energy transfer from the Agent to the Patient\pagenr{601}.
The prototypical action chain can be depicted as in \autoref{fig:action-chain}.
@@ -41,7 +54,21 @@
Different semantic roles can be categorised according to a thematic hierarchy (Fillmore 1968).
How many roles there are, what labels they should be given,
- and if they should be categorised or seen as on a prototypical scale, remain points of debate.
+ and if they should be categorised or seen as on a prototypical scale, remain points of debate\pagenr{604}.
+
+ Experiencer-Stimulus relations don't display energy transfer,
+ but often still have a notation of directionality%
+ \note{e.g. `She loves him'}.
+ When there is no directionality%
+ \note{e.g. `He resembles George Clooney'},
+ the speaker chooses to focus attention on one particular participant\pagenr{605}.
+
+ Since the subject is upstream in terms of energy flow,
+ a clause may have a subject and no object, but not vice versa%
+ \note{the object is meaningless without a subject}.
+ Such intransitive clauses still profile relations,
+ since they describe an interaction of the subject with itself
+ or a change in the world.
}
\end{document}