diff options
author | Camil Staps | 2015-11-03 14:42:30 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Camil Staps | 2015-11-03 14:42:42 +0100 |
commit | 861a506eb419b4e8a33298d2e67b8b4d9e48b18b (patch) | |
tree | ef8daea67643545b3a9769b34d05f1d52c85cd0c /Practical1/report/notation.tex | |
parent | Assignment 8 (diff) |
Report organisation practical 1
Diffstat (limited to 'Practical1/report/notation.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | Practical1/report/notation.tex | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Practical1/report/notation.tex b/Practical1/report/notation.tex index 3458029..07f9a34 100644 --- a/Practical1/report/notation.tex +++ b/Practical1/report/notation.tex @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ \section{Notation} +\label{sec:notation} I'm largely following Robson's notation \cite{robson}. For a graph $G=(V,E)$ and vertex $v\in V$, and edge $e\in E$, we write $d(v)$ for the degree of the vertex. $N(v)$ is the set of $v$'s neighbours, and $\iN(v)=N(v)\cup\{v\}$, $v$'s `inclusive neighbourhood'. Then $N^2(v)$ is the set of second order neighbours of $v$, excluding $v$: $N^2(v)=\{v_2 \in N(v_1) \mid v_1\in N(v)\} \setminus \{v\}$. If $\iN(v)\subseteq\iN(w)$, $v$ is said to dominate $w$, notation: $v>w$. We write `subgraph' for `vertex-induced subgraph', and $G\ex U$ for the subgraph induced on $G$ by $U$. For $v\in V$, we write $G\ex v$ for $G\ex\{v\}$. We use $e(v,w)$ for the predicate $(v,w)\in E$. We're strictly talking about non-directed graphs, so this is equivalent with $(w,v)\in E$. |