Finish chapter 9

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/sum-chap-9.tex b/sum-chap-9.tex
index db8b93a..5e819f0 100644
--- a/sum-chap-9.tex
+++ b/sum-chap-9.tex
@@ -109,11 +109,11 @@ There are two incarnational models possible after Chalcedon.
 			\item What is the scriptural basis for this model?
 		\end{itemize}
 
-	\item[Kenotic model] As in Phil.~2:6--7, \index{Kenosis}Jesus, the
-		pre-existant Son of God, \emph{emptied} himself of divine attributes to
-		become fully human. The central issue of this model is Christ's true deity.
-		We can offer three reinforcing strategies for the kenotic model based on
-		the forms of unity from Chapter 5.
+	\item[Kenotic] As in Phil.~2:6--7, \index{Kenosis}Jesus, the pre-existant Son
+		of God, \emph{emptied} himself of divine attributes to become fully human.
+		The central issue of this model is Christ's true deity.  We can offer three
+		reinforcing strategies for the kenotic model based on the forms of unity
+		from Chapter 5.
 
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item All members of the Trinity share a common nature and their
@@ -126,4 +126,10 @@ There are two incarnational models possible after Chalcedon.
 				kenosis, because Jesus never sinned or severed fellowship with the
 				Father and Spirit (though this was not easy, recall Gethsemane).
 		\end{itemize}
+
+		The kenotic model takes seriously the claim that the Logos became flesh
+		(Jn.~1:14) and that Jesus had to become like his brothers and sisters in
+		every respect (Heb.~2:17). By better accounting for Christ's humanity, it
+		allows for the idea of \index{Christ!Imitatio Christi}\emph{imitatio
+		christi}, the imitation of Christ.
 \end{description}