diff options
author | Camil Staps | 2015-10-10 23:01:10 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Camil Staps | 2015-10-10 23:01:10 +0200 |
commit | 071184bfd72bd576ba6a277ddcdd501604a7edd3 (patch) | |
tree | e69deb7625ab49b20fa09e0d0c9ee0bade118417 | |
parent | More summary chap 6 (diff) |
Continuing summary chapter 6
-rw-r--r-- | sum-chap-6.tex | 41 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sum-chap-6.tex b/sum-chap-6.tex index 08ab8db..cbc654b 100644 --- a/sum-chap-6.tex +++ b/sum-chap-6.tex @@ -39,5 +39,46 @@ Others, like Hume, accept the \emph{meaning} of the resurrection while rejecting its \emph{truth} (reductionists alter the meaning so that they may accept the truth, which has been altered thereby as well). \subsubsection*{The Easter appearances} + The Easter appearances all have the following in common: + + \begin{itemize} + \item They happen on Jesus' initiative. + \item There is an aspect of `ordinariness', unlike with other communication from God. + \item They were revealing events. + \item They were a special experience. + \item They had something to do with the non-transferable mission of the person to whom Jesus appeared. + \item They were in some sense visually perceptive. + \end{itemize} + + Some people try to account scientifically for the Easter appearances, however, these analogies always fail at crucial points. + + \subsubsection*{The discovery of the empty tomb} + There is a number of reasons why we may find the stories (in the Markan tradition and in John) of the discovery of the empty tomb historically reliable. + + First, in the Gospels there is some discussion \emph{why} the tomb was empty, but there is no question whether it really was empty. + + Second, if the story were invented by the first Christians, they would have let male disciples make the discovery. + + Third, we find also Paul talking about Christ rising `from the dead' in a physical manner, using exactly the same words as the evangelists. + + Lastly, it should be noted that in Pharisaic thinking like that of Paul, a resurrection without empty tomb would be inconceivable. + + \subsubsection*{Novelties to explain} + Augustine and others have proposed different reasons why we should think God was at work in the spreading of Christianity: + + \begin{itemize} + \item The disciples were uneducated and spread Christianity quickly. + \item Unlike the founders of other world religions, Jesus did not have a long career or strong military backing. + \end{itemize} + + There are other novelties that we need to explain: + + \begin{itemize} + \item The notion of a failing, suffering Messiah was uncommon to pre-Christian Judaism. + \item Also, the whole resurrection theme that was so central to early Christian preaching, cannot be found in contemporary Judaism or in Jesus' teaching. + \end{itemize} + + \subsubsection*{The resurrection as revealing: Jesus, God, human beings and their world} + To be done. \end{chapter} |