aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/assignment7/assignment7.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'assignment7/assignment7.tex')
-rw-r--r--assignment7/assignment7.tex81
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/assignment7/assignment7.tex b/assignment7/assignment7.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..489ca60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/assignment7/assignment7.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
+
+\usepackage[margin=2cm]{geometry}
+\usepackage{pdfpages}
+
+% textcomp package is not available everywhere, and we only need the Copyright symbol
+% taken from http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/1677/23992
+\DeclareTextCommandDefault{\textregistered}{\textcircled{\check@mathfonts\fontsize\sf@size\z@\math@fontsfalse\selectfont R}}
+
+\usepackage{fancyhdr}
+\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
+\renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt}
+\fancyhead{}
+\fancyfoot[C]{Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 Camil Staps}
+\pagestyle{fancy}
+
+\usepackage{amsmath}
+\usepackage{amsfonts}
+\usepackage{mathtools}
+
+\usepackage{array}
+\newcolumntype{C}[1]{>{\centering\let\newline\\\arraybackslash\hspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
+
+\usepackage{enumitem}
+\setenumerate[1]{label=\alph*.}
+\setenumerate[2]{label=(\roman*)}
+
+\parindent0pt
+
+\title{Operating Systems - assignment 7}
+\author{Camil Staps\\\small{s4498062}}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\maketitle
+\thispagestyle{fancy}
+
+\section*{9.1}
+\begin{enumerate}
+ \item See Table \ref{tab:91a}.
+ \begin{table}[h]
+ \centering
+ \footnotesize
+ \begin{tabular}{| r | *{21}{c|}} \hline
+ ms & 0 & 2 & 4 & 6 & 8 & 10 & 12 & 14 & 16 & 18 & 20 & 22 & 24 & 26 & 28 & 30 & 32 & 34 & 36 & 38 \\\hline
+ SPN & P1 & P1 & P2 & P2 & P2 & P2 & P2 & P2 & P4 & P4 & P4 & P3 & P3 & P3 & P3 & P5 & P5 & P5 & P5 & P5 \\\hline
+ SRT & P1 & P1 & P2 & P3 & P3 & P3 & P3 & P2 & P4 & P4 & P4 & P2 & P2 & P2 & P2 & P5 & P5 & P5 & P5 & P5 \\\hline
+ \end{tabular}
+ \caption{Applying the SPN and SRT algorithms to five processes}
+ \label{tab:91a}
+ \end{table}
+
+ \item See Table \ref{tab:91b}.
+ \begin{table}[h]
+ \centering
+ \footnotesize
+ \begin{tabular}{| r | *{4}{>{$}C{10mm}<{$} |}} \hline
+ & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{SPN} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{SRT} \\\hline
+ Process & T_r & T_r/T_s & T_r & T_r/T_s \\\hline
+ P1 & 4 & 1 & 4 & 1 \\
+ P2 & 14 & 1.167 & 28 & 2.333 \\
+ P3 & 24 & 3 & 8 & 1 \\
+ P4 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 \\
+ P5 & 20 & 2 & 20 & 2 \\\hline
+ Mean & 13.2 & 1.633 & 13.2 & 1.467 \\\hline
+ \end{tabular}
+ \caption{TAT and relative delay for the processes from Table \ref{tab:91a}}
+ \label{tab:91b}
+ \end{table}
+\end{enumerate}
+
+\section*{9.6}
+The diagram shows the situation where processes only move down to a lower priority queue when preempted. The first two time units allocated to A are actually two dispatches, each with time unit $2^0=1$. Then the process is preempted because of B and moves down the priority queues.
+
+However, if we move a process down the priority queues any time it finishes a time unit, A will continue running for three consecutive time units. First, one time unit in RQ0, and then two in RQ1.
+
+\section*{9.7}
+A steep line typically corresponds to a low service time, while a more gentle line corresponds to a high service time. The response ratio of a process with a low service time increases faster than that of a process with a high service time. Therefore, we should schedule the processes with a high service time last. If we schedule them earlier, the response times of other jobs increase rapidly and over a long time (that is, the service time of the running job). If we first schedule processes with a short service time however, the other response ratios don't increase that rapidly (because they belong to processes with a higher service time), and not for such a long time.
+
+\end{document}
+