\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}

\title{Dogmatics I\\\large{Discussion paragraph, week 2}}
\author{Camil Staps}

\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{dogmatics}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\input{sum-chap-3}

\section*{Discussion questions}
The text states that speaking equivocally about God and humans we would risk not communicating any significant knowledge of God. 

\begin{itemize}
    \item Is this correct, or is it possible to communicate knowledge of God without analogies at all?
    \item Is this a valid argument for \emph{not} speaking equivocally about God? If we agree that not speaking equivocally about God and creatures is a pitfall we must avoid, shouldn't we then simply accept that we \emph{cannot} communicate knowledge of God?
\end{itemize}

\end{document}

