diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'discussion-week-2.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | discussion-week-2.tex | 12 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/discussion-week-2.tex b/discussion-week-2.tex index 9d220a6..00b0a99 100644 --- a/discussion-week-2.tex +++ b/discussion-week-2.tex @@ -5,19 +5,11 @@ \usepackage{geometry} \usepackage{dogmatics} +\showquestionstrue \begin{document} \maketitle - +\discussionintro \input{sum-chap-3} - -\section*{Discussion questions} -The text states that speaking equivocally about God and humans we would risk not communicating any significant knowledge of God. - -\begin{itemize} - \item Is this correct, or is it possible to communicate knowledge of God without analogies at all? - \item Is this a valid argument for \emph{not} speaking equivocally about God? If we agree that not speaking equivocally about God and creatures is a pitfall we must avoid, shouldn't we then simply accept that we \emph{cannot} communicate knowledge of God? -\end{itemize} - \end{document} |